SUPREME COURT RALLY AND INDIANA

A flurry of activity keeps me tied down in recent days to keep me from writing about issues.  Two things have developed quickly that I want you to know about.

                  First, this Sunday afternoon, Apr. 19 from 1-6 p.m. I'm doing a fundraiser for an amazing Indiana lady running for U.S. Congress representing the Indianapolis area:  Sarah Janisse Brown.  You can google her campaign website on your own.

                  She's a home school mom with 15 kids--yes, you read that right--only 4 are still at home.  They run an agritourism homestead farm and the rally is titled FARM, FAMILY, AND FREEDOM.  That's my kind of headline and I'd love to see it well attended.

                  Knowing the few trolls on this blog who apparently get their life's energy from making erroneous assumptions and accusations, let me say straight up that both of these events are gratis:  I'm not charging a dime.  It's my way to tithe toward truth.

                  If you're in the Indianapolis area, I hope to see you at the rally. 

                  Number two is Monday, Apr. 27 from 9-12 noon, a MAHA rally on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C. to support folks wanting to preserve the freedom to sue businesses who poison them.  It's the Bayer glyphosate case, to determine if a business selling a product deemed safe by the EPA bears any liability obligation if it kills people.  This is not about the right for the government to determine safety; it simply means a company who buys government cover isn't indemnified from liability. 

                  I have a short speaking slot and simply appreciate being asked to lend my voice in a public way to defend the people's right to hold products accountable.  It seems strange to come alongside tort attorneys, which in general I find despicable, but the overarching issue here is the power of the federal government to absolve fascist business allies from accountability.  That cannot stand.

                  I tend to stay away from politics but not issues.  In these two cases, I'm pushing myself a bit past my comfort zone to encourage folks who dare to question the big government narrative.  We sure need more of them. 

                  How do you separate politics from issues?